Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Long-term creep behavior of the intervertebral disk: comparison between bioreactor data and numerical results|
|Authors:||Castro, A. P. G.|
Paul, C. P. L.
Detiger, S.E.L. et. al
Smit, T. H.
Van Royen, B. J.
Claro, J. C. Pimenta
Mullender, M. G.
Loaded disk culture system
Custom finite element solver
|Publisher:||Frontiers in bioengineering and biothecnology|
|Citation:||Castro, A.P.G. et al. (2014). Long-term creep behavior of the intervertebral disk. comparison between bioreactor data and numerical results. Frontiers in bioengineering and biothecnology, 2(56), 1-8.|
|Abstract:||The loaded disk culture system is an intervertebral disk (IVD)-oriented bioreactor developed by the VU Medical Center (VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), which has the capacity of maintaining up to 12 IVDs in culture, for approximately 3 weeks after extraction. Using this system, eight goat IVDs were provided with the essential nutrients and submitted to compression tests without losing their biomechanical and physiological properties, for 22 days. Based on previous reports (Paul et al., 2012, 2013; Detiger et al., 2013), four of these IVDs were kept in physiological condition (control) and the other four were previously injected with chondroitinase ABC (CABC), in order to promote degenerative disk disease (DDD). The loading profile intercalated 16 h of activity loading with 8 h of loading recovery to express the standard circadian variations. The displacement behavior of these eight IVDs along the first 2 days of the experiment was numerically reproduced, using an IVD osmo-poro-hyper-viscoelastic and fiber-reinforced finite element (FE) model. The simulations were run on a custom FE solver (Castro et al., 2014). The analysis of the experimental results allowed concluding that the effect of the CABC injection was only significant in two of the four IVDs. The four control IVDs showed no signs of degeneration, as expected. In what concerns to the numerical simulations, the IVD FE model was able to reproduce the generic behavior of the two groups of goat IVDs (control and injected). However, some discrepancies were still noticed on the comparison between the injected IVDs and the numerical simulations, namely on the recovery periods. This may be justified by the complexity of the pathways for DDD, associated with the multiplicity of physiological responses to each direct or indirect stimulus. Nevertheless, one could conclude that ligaments, muscles, and IVD covering membranes could be added to the FE model, in order to improve its accuracy and properly describe the recovery periods.|
|Appears in Collections:||E/EM - Artigos|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.